MUHAMMAD WAHEED AKHTAR versus STATE
The suspension of section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b), led to the suspension that there was a collision between the ocular evidence and the medical evidence because the victim had received a wound which was in fact a External injury was and was. As far as the applicant / accused is concerned, there is no independent injury in the case of the accused, which needed further consideration, the applicant / accused was punished,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer
