Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 bail, further investigation against the accused was that he managed to escape or take away the complainant's daughter. The defendant's confession was that he regularly entered into marriage with the complainant's daughter and did not commit any crime. The accused also submitted that the marriage contract is formally registered in the relevant union council and in this regard he cited a certificate issued by the secretary of the union council, the union council, the marriage attachment and the marriage between the two parties. The rights were presented for restitution, filed against each other by the accused and the complainant's daughter, who led a further investigation, which was behind bars. Since his arrest was no longer necessary for investigative purposes, whether the defendant's version was correct or that of the complainant, he would be judged by the trial court. He was granted bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
