HAFIZ MUHAMMAD JAMIL NASIR versus DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER/APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA
Article 152 (1) (i) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 declared the declaration of assets ineligible for withdrawal from the declaration of assets jointly signed by the two candidates but mentioned only one candidate's assets And the relevant part of the printed form was accepted by the Nomination Returning Officer stating that the submission of a separate form, declaration of assets is irregular and not invalid and nomination papers are merely Can't rule out technical stuff Legality law requires separate declaration and candidates were bound assets The disclosure of all of its assets during the declaration was certainly fatal and in the event of a change, the candidates were not eligible to elect a member of the local government, with the exception of misinterpretation of assets or declaration of assets, with penalties for ineligibility. There was no objection to the joint declaration of registration before the Returning Officer was not well established as the objection was raised at the relevant time, obviously by the candidates separately and in accordance with the law. Was not completed and signed, therefore, to select both candidates They were disqualified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
