Find a Lawyer

IMRAN versus STATE

Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), 5 324 bail, was denied in this case after the alleged incident of eighteen days, but the reason for such delay was not only stated in the FIR But it was also understandable that the sole perpetrator of the alleged crime in the FIR and the complainant was designated as the cause of a specific fireworks injury at the lower right. Their statements to the full extent of the alleged involvement of the accused in the crime were very closely related to each other and to such close relations between the parties and to the fact that they were the only accused in the case. The accused for the perpetrator, the possibility of false interference and substitution were not easily trusted, the allegations leveled against the accused in the Prima facie medical evidence were supported by Investigative FIR records, showed that at the relevant time The tension between the parties involved a family background and the suspect was directly linked to the crime, according to the investigation. Ron was rescued by local police from the possession of the accused. The accused's offense had already submitted challan against the accused under section 324, the PPC attracted the prohibition clause contained in section (1) of section 497, the accused in the alleged crime of CRPima. Reasonable grounds for requesting surety's involvement were dismissed. Conditions list of supreme court advocates from Bannu lawyer