Find a Lawyer

BASHIR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 8 (1) and 9, the testimony of witnesses who are closely related to it and the evidence of the Chemical Examiner effect against both the accused / appellants. The delay in sending the weapons to the accused was the murder of the victim, who was the wife of the second accused / appellant on suspicion of having illicit relations with the sister of the accused / appellant along with the two accomplices. And sentenced the accused / appellants to death and acquitted the co-accused. The FIR of the litigation was immediately filed with the names and specific roles of the accused, which stated that under the medical evidence, the doctor under the leadership of the prosecution had been admitted, who was posted on the death of the deceased. The inspector was not examined by the accused, the prosecutor proved the motive for the success against the accused. The prosecution has alleged that it is weak or the prosecution has failed to prove the motive, that fact alone will not be fatal. It is not the case nor does it alleviate matters, guaranteeing a lower sentence where beyond reasonable doubt. If the accused was charged, then the absence or failure to prove the motive would not come in the way of accepting the usual death sentence in the case of a murder, obviously, which was four months before the chemical inspector sent a weapon. I delayed because the Chemical Examiner / Serologist's report was untrustworthy, but this case weakened the prosecutor's case. Was given. The testimony of the witnesses or the close relationship with the deceased had no valid basis for excluding their evidence. Regardless of whether jobs for fresh advocates from Mehar lawyer