The penalty of appreciation of sections 156 (1) (14) (82) (86) and 178 of the evidence, the reduction of the charges under section 342 in its statement, the CRPC has admitted that it has filed the controversial documents before the customs authorities. Were filed. In view of this matter, the provisions of Section 209 of the Customs Act, 1969 were drawn up and held that the trial court had found the accused guilty and sentenced, to the extent of the conviction, There was no illegal interference to guarantee the intervention of the High Court. The accused was an agent of a company, and while acting on behalf of the company, he presented the dispute to the customs authorities and did not benefit, the signatures of the disputed registration were not on his signatures, which would mean That the document was not prepared by the accused. The trial court adopted a slightly stringent view, while the conviction of the accused and the soft view in this regard could bring about the end of justice. The accused had spent a considerable period of time as a prisoner in the trial and the accused was sentenced while excluding the offender's appeal. The period has already passed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
