Find a Lawyer

USMAN ALI ALIAS IMRAN ALIAS BILLI versus STATE

Section 302, 365 A & 201 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a) (e), the benefit of doubt in the value of the evidence remains the whole matter of prosecution on circumstantial evidence. Identifying the suspect by telephone voice; Extra-judicial confession of the accused; The deceased, upon hearing of the accused, recovered the body of his rope and two ropes; the purpose of being located; It had identified the accused's voice over the telephone demanding ransom for the life of his deceased son. The complainant never received the caller's number who demanded the ransom money and FIR, and the data available on record were silent about the investigating officer, about the telephone during the investigation. There was no attempt to collect data from which the accused allegedly summoned the complainant to pay the ransom, otherwise it was not easy to identify him by the voice of a person on the telephone. And such evidence can prove it. It cannot be accepted, except that the Long Point salt defendants visited the prosecution's witness and confessed to their crime where the witness was also given. It was unclear why the accused would have previously confessed to the crime, when the witnesses had no evidence when it could be said that the witnesses were influential people in the area who had to deal with the accused's extra-judicial confession. On the complainant, otherwise weak was the evidence of this kind that was generally omitted when linking the accused to the crime. pakistani advocates Multan lawyer