Find a Lawyer

KHAYBER ALI versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 555 An accused, convicted, was sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000, but in the verdict, no mention of imprisonment. The appeal was not subject to the payment of a fine of the High Court, but the sentence was reduced in the period in which the accused had already passed, but no order was passed in respect of the penalty. It was instead that a prison term was imposed. The petition, filed by the accused for a pardon waiver, was withdrawn, but at the relevant time the present complaint of the accused was not brought to the court, and it was also found that the expulsion was merely of a learned nature. It is the High Court, in which the accused's petition was submitted under section 6161 AA. , CR PCs and the use of inherent powers can remove such a mistake To meet the pursuit of justice, the High Court reduced the fine from Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 25,000 and to pay the fine. I, the accused will pass double the month \ Section I, except for such change, the decision of the High Court remains unregistered \ r \ n list of advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer