Find a Lawyer

AJAIB SIKANDAR versus MUHAMMAD JAVAID ALIAS JAIDEE

Section 302 exemption for clarification of evidence against Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (XXI of 1980), Section 14 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 417. The appeal against was not obtained by the accused in connection with some controversial material relating to the disability by the prosecution's witnesses; in the absence of direct evidence, the circumstances submitted by the prosecution must be carefully examined. This is because the evidence of this nature can be falsified if the last time the evidence as well as the other parts have been considered. According to the evidence, then it was not safe to rely on such evidence as the Shariat Court criminal saw on the knife wrist watch and the leather cap, he was recovered from a village, but said no one from the village The person was not affiliated with the Shariat court in the recovery process, alleging that the alleged recovery was correct, that the accused had the right to benefit from the FIR and not in any other statement of the complaining party. It was revealed that the victim, too, was keeping a wrist watch with him, initially the prosecution's witnesses were involved in the killing. Yes, but later he was testified against the police station in charge. ; The circumstances could not be ignored if the police station in charge had involved the accused on the basis of fake evidence; allegedly Rs. 8,000 was recovered from the accused, which according to the prosecution's version, the accused was killed by the accused. Was out of pocket and paid for the litigation. Witness, not proven advocate from Chaininda lawyer