Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

The value of the evidence in section 2 (2 (b)) was not challenged at the time of the incident; the plaintiff's witness, who was the brother of the deceased, was presented with a general account and nothing was on record to show that. That both said that the witnesses had any illicit desire, hostility or complaint against the accused. In a false case, they both expressed a very strong and confident view of the facts of the incident and their statements were immediately returned to F. The IR prosecution was proven by the facts of the witness's entry or it cannot be said that his statements were not available at the time of the incident. Medical evidence was also assisted, there was strong evidence in the form of recovery of the weapon and one of the offenses found there was against the accused, on the occasion two vacancies were collected. According to the laboratory and the report, one of the vacancies married the recovered pistol while another was vacated on the EE without a comment because it was without a collision cap. It is disputed that no independent witness was involved during the recovery of the pistol and that such recovery has been effected by the accused's father-in-law's house, The defendants did not help because the unarmed pistol belonged to the accused, who had no other motive behind his license, other than the motive set forth in the FIR, in support of the appeal against the defendant's conviction and conviction. There was no reduction, was excluded and the trial court's decision was upheld. power of attorney advocate Upper Deval lawyer