Find a Lawyer

FARYAD ANJUM MASIH versus STATE

Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 bail, during interrogation, the accused denied in the statement to the police that he dealt with the sale and purchase of alcohol as well as the accused. On the occasion of being arrested and recovering 19 bottles of alcohol, it was revealed that he had been kept for sale purposes, the accused, the first felon, was involved in this heinous crime and his liar. Failed to reveal any reason for involvement. According to the police report, under section 737373, the PC was presented to the court, and the police cited only a few witnesses in the witnesses' calendar, indicating that the trial was concluded against the accused. Is already likely to happen. Although Section 497 did not fall under the CRPC prohibition clause and the sanction of bail in such cases was a rule and the refusal was exempt, it would not mean that the offense had become a guaranteed discretion, yet rest. D With the court, which had to be treated with fairness, taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case, the crime allegedly by the accused was against the society and if the accused was released on bail, There is a possibility of a repeat of the crime. Fell into immunity and showed no good ground for the release of the accused on bail \ r \ n law firms from Abdul Hakim lawyer