MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE
Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 24B24 bail, denied the defendant a hatchet injury to the injured head and one of the co-accused was declared a sutta injury on the right arm of the injured. Was related to the recovery of related weapons. The accused was found guilty, the accused was found guilty during the interrogation, the statement was made under Section 161, the CCP fully involved in the crime, the injured under Section 161. The statement did not mention the specific cancellation of the wounds on the accused. , CCP, showing negligence or negligence by the Investigation Officer, another co-accused, whose bail was granted, no body was hurt in any way, no matter what, The circumstances were prominent, which said that the two accused were accused of being associated with the Commission of Crime, which came under section 497 (1) prohibited clause of CRPC, were not entitled to bail, Air Bail Request for was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Amangarh lawyer