Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD AHMAD KHAN versus RENT CONTROLLER

Sections 2 (c) (i), 13 (2) (i), 13 (3) and 13 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional rent on a default basis for payment of rent and instability. Removal of cedar. The landlord and the tenant refuse to strike with the control of the rent despite the denial of the landlord and the tenant relationship directs the tenant / applicant to consider the landlord and tenant relationship Future monthly rent for the entity and the party should submit alone. The terms of the rent controller's order were not complied with, defended by the rent controller and said that the rent controller's order was upheld in the appeal even though the property was rented. Had legitimately justified the existence of a landlord and tenant relationship, but had committed a serious legal error, while instructing the applicant to submit the rent to the public exchequer on the issue of rent control. Violated the law. The landlord and tenant relationship between the parties, a person claiming to be the landlord, had to produce documentary documents and / and unreasonable oral evidence on the issue of rent control, landlord and tenant relationship. Without deciding, there was no jurisdiction to proceed on the matter, unless the matter continued. The decision to touch the jurisdiction of the rent controller was decided for the first time on a rent controller's order in which he instructed the applicant to collect future monthly rent and subsequently passed orders. inheritance advocates near Musafir Khana lawyer