Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 (b) of evidence was delayed by nine hours in reporting the matter to the police, sufficient explanation was given by the complainant in the FIR the name of the accused was stated as the sole accused. He had four hat raids. Both eyes are witnesses who were closely related to the accused; there was no possibility of substitution of the accused except the real culprit as he had severed relations with his wife, who was the complainant's sister and the murdered complainant. No other person was involved in the matter. Only because of their close relationships and with the deceased would they be considered interested witnesses who had no previous enmity, illicit desire or desire to keep the accused involved in the case falsely accused, and the witnesses free and The natural witness was a resident of the house where the incident took place. And his presence was sufficiently explained on that occasion, the site plan showed that the lightning bulb was operating at that time and witnesses said the incident was seen in the light of the bulb, testing the witnesses at length. The investigation was targeted, but the defense failed to raise suspicion about the false implications of the alleged presence of witnesses and the minor contradictions in the statements. Prosecutors' testimony could not be termed fatal to the prosecution's version, but it was natural that statements of credible and trustworthy witnesses could not be dismissed as linking the accused to the crime. Had a molecular account for. Medical evidence about the whereabouts of the injury and his support have been confirmed immigration advocate from Mari Indus lawyer