Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

Definition of sections 302 (b) (c) and 109 evidence. The complainant, who was the victim's husband, was not an eyewitness, only two eye witnesses were in the case. One was the daughter of the victim and the other was the nephew of the FIR, who was immediately registered within two hours of the incident, while the distance between the police station and the site of the incident was 12 miles. He was a real brother and was convicted of a crime. Under Sections 302 (c) and 109, the PPC, following the death of the appellant, his appeal was disrupted and was dealt with because the magistrate held the identity parade of the accused who said That all precautions were taken and given to hold the parade. The magistrate was examined in the case, but no question was raised before him, although the opportunity was given in connection with the recovery of the pistol when the crime was cleared. Firearms Expert report was also arrested. The only witness, who was positive, was the daughter of the deceased because the other witness had been abandoned, who was allegedly won by the accused. Syed said that the sole witness had fully supported the prosecution of the osecution case, The accused had been identified during the trial, but also before the trial court and the accused was responsible for the death of his mother and if his statement alone was affected by trust and not his quantity, he had to see the quality of the evidence. Was. It came from unidentified sources and had a personal value, was a death sentence, could be maintained on the basis of such statement. Goed single Goa top advocates from Kashmore lawyer