ARBAB ALIAS QASIM versus STATE
On the basis of the strict record of Section 497 Preventive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34 and 114 bail, the accused's grant showed that the matter was adjourned at the request of the accused on some occasions. But at the same time, the petitioner was also delayed by the complainant's delay at the end of the trial, firstly because of the absence of the accused. Secondly, it was due to a request from the complaining party to postpone. And the third case was decided by the trial court's negligence because on some occasions the matter was adjourned because the judge was engaged in election matters or was on leave, because of the failure of the prosecution to properly examine the prosecution's witnesses. The accused could not be convicted. A timely bail was granted to the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Chishtian lawyer