Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus STATE

The testimonies of Sections 302, 34 and 109 were reported to the police two days after the incident, when the police station was two kilometers away from the scene and the complainant's brother was also said to have injured a retired police officer. ? The relevant Rural Health Center was brought to the hospital after the incident and after being taken to the hospital, but no legal report of the medico has been made, nor is there any evidence available except for the witness statement. Such was the lockdown in the prosecution's case about being taken to the hospital. At the relevant time, the suspicion of the presence of the prosecution witness was raised after the FIR was lodged after consultation and consideration, which cannot be denied, no witnesses have heard of any of the three accomplices. He was not accused of being involved in one word and blaming another. The co-accused was not proven because the statement of the prosecution witness was silent in this regard, at the time, date and place where it is alleged that the co-accused had benefited from his co-accused Manner and Mood, which stated That the co-accused allegedly incited his other co-accused was unbelievable, as witnesses in that regard never bothered to inform the complainant well after the hearing. Over time, because the co-accused was the father of the other two co-accused, the false allegation that he had a rivalry with the complainant, along with his partner, could not be denied that the other partner None of the accused has been named in a special role famous high court advocate from Daharki lawyer