Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus MST. GHULAM FATIMA

Section 491 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 Complainant demanded that the accused's case be taken because the applicant took his daughter because one of the applicants filed for her Had an illicit relationship with the police, but the police found the case to be a false and prepared casino report. Investigated the matter at various levels, but the complainant's daughter could not be ascertained. Going; too, if the complainant succeeds in locating his daughter anywhere in illegal custody, she will be entitled to reinstate her application so that the complainant's daughter cannot be recovered, for the complainant. It was important to keep the record before the trial court passed a copy of the order passed under the section 149 petition, CRPC, and the trial court's approval of the controversial order seeking the accused, but that did not happen. , The contention order seeking the accused was not upheld and was not legal. And was liable to set aside, the unclean order was set aside and the trial court to consider the order passed on request under section 491, CCPC, and to issue a fresh order after hearing by the parties. Was instructed. top civil advocates from Muzaffarabad lawyer