Find a Lawyer

BAQIR versus AHMAD

Sue 4, 15, 21 and 27 Prior to the Forcible Trial, the plaintiff asserted its first right of sovereignty in relation to the suit land, being its shareholders / leaseholders and owners of the State Defense. ? The cousin was the tenant of the plaintiffs' suit by producing granary and measles garages, so he had obtained the highest right of literacy, proving that the day he obtained the suit land, apart from the defendant. Another person was the tenant of the suit land and was farming. Defendant testified that he was the tenant of the suit land in the relevant date, but he failed to exclude the same appellate court, which relied on Khusra Gadwari, deciding the matter in favor of the defendant, Which was not shown on the record even though it was on file. The document cannot be valued at all, depending on the appellate court's finding that the document is clearly against the appellate court's decision, in the circumstances, was not legally significant in the appellant's appeal decision and in the illegal business. The affidavit was set aside and consequently the trial court's order was restored. \ r \ n \ r \ n best advocate from Qazi Ahmed lawyer