Find a Lawyer

MST. KALSOOM BIBI versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION JAMPUR THROUGH D.P.O., RAJANPUR

Section 1 561A, & 265K and 249 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 7 and 11 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional proceedings under the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction. And is a crime. The Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, a year after the alleged abduction, was filed against the applicants and other accomplices. That the woman applicant was Sue Jorge, who voluntarily entered into a marriage contract. That the applicants were living as husband and wife, breastfeeding children. No one can be allowed to interfere with their marital life. In this case, the delay in the registration of the FIR has been of no use in the case where there is family honor involved. For, before contacting the police, all other sources were investigating the matter and the challan was presented in a court of competent jurisdiction where the applicants can seek alternative action if the High Court is satisfied that there is a reasonable substance that the accused. Legal proceedings have been initiated for the purpose of harassing or in the presence of The process will use. Under Section 265K and 249A, CCPC, alternatively, there was no benefit to stop the proceedings. In the initial phase, the termination of the proceedings was neither valid nor preferable, and every criminal case has its own merits. Was allowed to proceed on dismissal of the constitutional application family advocate from Sangla Hill lawyer