Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE versus ABDUL KARIM

Section 6 and 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R-27 Additional evidence for pre-emption case, preparation of application for appellate court even though the applicant's application was filed at a later stage. Was excluded for additional evidence. And fill in the lacuna in proof of that. And there can be no basis for denying the same petition, but the applicant was well aware of the fact that he had to prove his former copyright, or he could have presented some evidence of pre-copyright rights. Had failed to do. Co-owner or owner of adjacent property; or have a common interest in irrigation. Or the general passage of the case from the 1994 until its dismissal from 17 to 17000, allowing the applicant to present additional evidence would not only be unreasonable, but it would also have to send the respondents / vendors to the position for which approval. Yet it was at the time of sale. For more than a decade, the courts have always wanted to deal with both parties in deciding the matter, and if the party's termination or disappearance, the other party has acquired any right or in particular in it. The pre-emptive case; in the case of additional evidence, did not show any kind of flexibility for mere discrimination that the documents were tried to prove in evidence; they were part of the public record. how to become a advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer