Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus STATE

Articles 2?2 (b) and 34 34 of the definition of evidence, reduction of sentence and sudden provocation were recorded with FIR delays and allegations of deliberations that the accused, who divorced his wife Had given the deceased the divorce charge and committed the murder of the victim. During the trial, the accused pleaded serious and sudden provocation, the trial court sentenced the accused to death, his case was not registered at the police station, he was also seen with suspicion. The investigation was called, and the incident was reported to the police indirectly. As a motive for the incident, the complainant alleged that the accused had been convinced that the deceased was behind a divorce from his wife who admitted to failing to prove the victim's prosecution. That he did not investigate whether the accused had divorced his wife or not, before the incident, the complainant stated at trial that the accused had divorced his wife verbally three months before the incident. The accused asserted that he did not divorce his wife. The prosecution had failed to prove the facts of the divorce, the accused had requested to see his (accused's) wife. With the victim, under suspicion and sudden provocation, the accused killed the victim with a single blow of the fountain while his wife escaped, however, the accused failed to specify the questionable position in which he and his wife and the accused Was not included in the whole scope. Under section 2302 (c), the PPC case was not a death sentence best advocate from Besham lawyer