Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 242424/34 complain bail, the defendant and his accomplice on the refusal of the injured complainant to shoot and injure the injured legator and his accomplices The wounds of the fire were declared. Officers showed an outbreak of section 324 in the final result of X-ray injuries, PPC was not deleted, crime against the accused fell under section 497 prohibition clause, CCPI witnesses told police. Full support for the trial presented before. And the investigating officer, after a thorough investigation, was also charged with the recovery of 30 bore pistols from the accused who were fully involved, the FIR was filed immediately and it was a day's case. The accused has been absconding for more than a year. Large police records have revealed that the accused was a record holder and five FI rupees were registered against him under various sections of the PPC, to show that the accused was a habitual offender and was involved in serious and hateful crimes. Yes, a temporary review of the evidence on the record shows that there was enough evidence in the FIR to link the accused to the aforementioned criminal charges. patent advocate from Abbottabad lawyer