MESSRS MADINA CLOTH HOUSE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 13, 61, 62, 65 and 66 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance's Office of Establishment (2000 v), Section 9 (2) and 2 (3) Notice of Unclear Investment for the Preparation of Account Books Best Decisions The power of the Commissioner to amend by the Evaluation Additional, the complainant of the jurisdictional corruption complaint, had filed a return under the Self Assessment Scheme as well as the total audit was taken for the Wealth Tax Statement which revealed that the complaint Such expenditure is not explained under section 13, 61, 62, when the buyer purchased a plot and rebuilt his house. Income Tax Ordinance, 65 of 1979 and was issued and made a valid assessment for the relevant years, complaint was lodged against the complainant. The complainant filed an appeal against the diagnostic order and was absent from the proceedings, however. The Federal Tax Ombudsman felt the record was lacking. The order sheet and current information were used, which could have led to incorrect conclusions so the action should have been ignored. Gaya and the Central Board of Revenue were directed to issue additional instructions to the Additional Commissioners to issue records and inspect the taxation. Officer to be more bound
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
