Find a Lawyer

MST. TAJ MAI versus ILLAQA MAGISTRATE, SECTION 30, ALIPUR

Sections 173 of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), Sections 452 and 337H (ii) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 10 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), the constitutional application of Article 199 challenged the orders of the Judicial Magistrate by the cancellation of the FIR applicant / complainant, under which the FIR was registered by the FIR on the police report. The judicial magistrate canceled on the police's conclusion that the FIR story was unfounded and debatable. The cancellation of the FIR through the process of law, the existence of an FIR on the relevant registers maintained under the Police Rules 1934, ceased to exist. Was canceled by a competent court order, suspended for. Total disregard of the law, because the order to cancel the FIR was not finalized before any court for review or an appeal or constitutional request to cancel the FIR. The present constitutional petition, filed after an interval of two years from an unidentified order, falls under the principles of the Order of Magistrate under which the report submitted under section 173, CR PC in the FIR is not implemented. Was included in the record, was also legal and did not suffer any unlawful interference or material misconduct, demanding intervention by the High Court in a constitutional jurisdiction. immigration advocates from Rajana lawyer