PIR MUHAMMAD NOOR versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, further investigation into the mosque was granted, but no evidence was obtained from the anonymous FIR which stated that the accused Was with two people and he encountered all three. There should have been some resistance from the victim's colleagues, but on this point the FIR was silent that an FIR could be filed by either of the deceased colleagues present on the occasion, but they had filed an FIR. Was not listed, but was reported, according to the old National Identity Card as well as the Computerized National Identity Card, the brother of the deceased who filed the FIRFIR, which was filed 8 hours after the incident, The information partner was silent at the time, as well as the computerized national ID card witnessed over 79 years old, In the statement under section 62 of the YC, various prescriptions were given as they claimed two persons were killed and the other two were injured because their statement was contrary to the statement in the FIR case, which further investigated. Needed, bail granted to the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Badin lawyer