I..T.AS. NOS. 4901/LB OF 2004 AND 2581/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 26TH NOVEMBER, 2005. versus I..T.AS. NOS. 4901/LB OF 2004 AND 2581/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 26TH NOVEMBER, 2005.
Section 62 (1) of the Assessment of Accounts, Proof of Accounts, etc., for the re-consideration of the Assessment, asserts that the returning version is admissible, hence the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Provision 62 (1) was not followed up on this question as to whether, after careful examination of the books of accounts under section 62 (1) of the Income Tax, the legality of the case was examined to identify the defects. Where there is a legal weakness of not issuing a legal notice. The ordinance, 1979 was actually the first appellate authority to approve a suitable curriculum course in such circumstances, which was to accept the direct version in its entirety, instead the return version of the Assisi for de novo action would be well accepted. And accordingly it was ordered. First appellate authority's appellate tribunal order vacated \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
