Find a Lawyer

DR. ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE

Sections 3 (1) (4) and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), termination of section 561 proceedings against the applicant / accused in any way to remit or remit the benefit to the public in any way There was no evidence to prove I was involved. And that too, as mentioned in the Human Trafficking Prevention and Prevention Ordinance 2002, the prosecution failed to investigate any witnesses during the investigation, which would prevent human trafficking and Under the Control Ordinance 2002, the applicant could provide evidence of interference. It was said that it was smuggled out of Pakistan for exploitation, slavery, forced labor or adoption, and these four elements were also emphasized in Section 4 of the Prevention and Control of Human Trafficking Prevention Ordinance and when Unless the crime is committed, a case is registered under Section 3. 4 more of the ordinance will not be signed, no case under the Human Trafficking Prevention and Control Ordinance 2002 d be presented against the applicant and in strange circumstances the accused is unlikely to be convicted of the alleged crime. However, the request was granted, and the process was terminated accordingly. \ r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer