Find a Lawyer

NASEEB-UR-REHMAN versus DILAWAR KHAN

Sections 497 (5) and 498 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), 5 337A (i) (ii) The application for cancellation of pre-arrest bail was filed against two men and five women, one male accused in large numbers. I was, while the other men and five women were released on bail and their pre-arrest bail was confirmed. The request for the cancellation of the bail plea was made by the present petitioners, the accused, the five female complainant and the prosecution witnesses released on bail were declared to have no special role in the injuries. Regarding the role assigned by the women, the contents of the FIR do not confirm that a person's injury to the complainant's wife was caused by a sharp weapon, while, on the part of the complainant or the prosecution's witnesses. All other injuries were from two sources. In the FIR, the medical report was not supported in the circumstances, the female accused deserved bail conditions, the case of the other male accused was different, as she was accused of positive role. Which was confirmed by the Medico Legal Report. He is found guilty of assaulting a woman and injuring her head with a sharp weapon. The incident took place at a place where respect for women was extended despite the worst rivalry between the parties, once the bail was canceled, it met the standard. On the facts of the need to confirm prior arrest in court, the court observed that throwing a wide net and affecting all family members, including five women, established the complainant's economic stability. ask a advocate free from Sarai Alamgir lawyer