MST. SURRIYA BEGUM versus MST. HAMIDA BEGUM
Prior to the termination of the case for section 13 and 13 13, the right of superior privilege and suit of making tollbs, both the courts, concluding that the notice was not sent to Talab Eshad, was based on the result. Was derived. Firstly, since the original notices were presented in court by a hearing which was sufficient to show that it was not sent, and second, to prove to any officer of the post office that the reasons for the court were to be sent. Was not submitted. Earlier, the emperors claimed that they had failed to prove Talab b Ashid, were appropriate and that the following courts could not be rejected for good reasons. It is found that the former emperors have failed to prove that they have a high right to pre-emption. In accordance with the record, in the absence of any jurisdictional error or any other legal weakness in illegal decisions and orders, the High Court cannot interfere with the exercise of its jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Lahore lawyer
