MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE
Definition of Section 311 evidence was filed immediately after the accused was the complainant's real brother and the deceased accused was also shot in the presence of witnesses which caused him to die on the spot, One of the prosecution's witnesses, who was the real brother of the deceased, had no enmity or any strong motive to be falsely involved in the case, and it is commonplace to hate that a real brother actually exists in his place. Has been reasonably explained and no one was there. Refusing to accept his statement, it was said that Syed's witness was cross examined, but his testimony did not shake him. The other eye witness also remained constant on all the material details of the case and despite its clear scrutiny, nothing could be extracted from his testimony. He was targeted during the trial, saying the witness contradicted the statement of the other witness at the main point. He was an independent witness because he did not belong to any deceased or accused. The witness also substantially proved his presence on the occasion that the testimony of the witness was credible and the collateral account was consistent with the medical evidence, which also contained proof of fact. Positive report of gun recovery and forensic science laboratory prosecution in the working order has proved beyond any doubt to maintain the conviction against the accused under the circumstances, the court has already sentenced the accused after the trial. Was punished, and sentenced. The trial court was retained under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Muzaffarabad lawyer