Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus STATE

Sections 2, 2, 6 30 Q & 8 308 Legal testimony (10 of 1984 1984 to 1984) Article 121 cases were immediately defined by the police. The complainant, who was in the accused's brother-in-law, has no enmity with the victim. The six-year-old was a real son. The accused's two witnesses were the real sons of the accused, and it is common knowledge that the real son will falsely expel his father. Their statements contradicted each other and nothing could be excluded from their testimony, despite the fact that they had been subjected to cross-examination for a long time, the Ocular Account was confirmed by the Medical Proof Defense Version, Did not appeal to the intellect because the accused failed to make a confession under it. Article 121 of the Law Testimony, 1984, and it cannot be believed that a real mother would replace her child's actual murderer and falsely include him in the accused when both versions of the accused and the prosecution were replaced by a parable. If taken, the account was more reasonable and convincing and defensive. The prosecution had proven beyond doubt that the defendant had no doubt to maintain the conviction, the trial court killed his own son. Despite the brutal act, the accused was already convicted and sentenced. The accused were retained by the trial court best advocate from Chishtian lawyer