Find a Lawyer

PROF. MUHAMMAD YAHYA CH. versus STATE

Article 18 (6) of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), sections 420, 468, 471 and 406 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Report on the abrogation of the constitutional application was prepared on the oral instruction of the section CPP (Investigation). That was not brought. Until the magistrate's notice, the magistrate passed the unauthorized injunction without applying his mind, which was not fully in line with the law, which led to the preparation of the cancellation report. The pair were linked to the arrests. In this case and with the preparation of the police report, the law was declared violated and the 2002 rules of the provisions of the High Courts of the Police Order were also violated, in which case it was approved by the Judicial Magistrate. Was deemed approved. With no legal authority and no legal effect 1998 PCRL J56; 1991 PCRL J62; PLD 1985 SC 62; Brave and others vs. State and other PLD 1985 SC 62; ER 1968 S. C117; Khazar Hayat vs. IG Punjab PLD 2005 LA 470; Improvement Trust by Hazara (Hill Tract) Chairman and others vs. Qaiser Elahi and others 2005 SCMR 678; Government of Pakistan and another V Begam Agha Abdul Al-Karim Insurgents Kashmir PLD 1969 SC 14 and Mohammad Bashir vs. Abdul Karim PLD 2004 SC 271 Ref. how to become a advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer