Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMED versus YOUSAF

In section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the respondent with regard to section 115 suit for possession claimed in his claim that the landed property, which was the property of eviction, was transferred to him on the basis of his possession. And it was released by PTD. Respondents said that her parents died when she was a child and was raised by applicants who were her cousins and cousins, respectively, and when seeking a majority, she requested the applicants that she Moved to their own home in the same area but they refused. Therefore, the applicants had previously claimed that they kept this in writing from the respondent under which they would not relinquish their possession and then the applicants claimed that they had bought the house after paying its price. The respondent denied the applicant's claims and filed a lawsuit for ownership, which resulted in the order being issued simultaneously. By presenting oral and documentary evidence, the trial court and the appellant below the respondent had fully proved that the landlord was in transfer, and Ed denied that he had ever applied. Had agreed to sell or sell the house to, had, of course, resided in the defendant-owned house, and after the death of his parents, he could obtain the defendant in addition to the license. Do not claim any further interest in the said house and the applicant could not prove that the property was sold to him by the defendants, even if it is deemed that the petitioner lawer from fb area from Kacha Khooh lawyer