Find a Lawyer

MESSRS AL-MAKKAH PRESS PVT. LTD., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Sections 170 (4), 171, 161 and 205 Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Circular No. 5 of the CBR, delayed 30th 2003 2003 Refund Extra Payment for Refund Receipt As a result of the overpayment for which the application was associated with the return even though refunds were to be issued within 45 days of receipt of the request, there was no response to sent reminders. The Department claimed that the payment of tax is required on the tax officer and only the fact that the return is qualified under the Universal Self Assessment Scheme, Income Tax Ordinance The Department did not prohibit the Department from seeking the provisions of Section 161/205 of the Nissan 2001 to show notice of the determination of default for tax withholding. Section 161/205 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was issued and alternative treatment was available on appeal under the provisions of section 170 (5). Income Tax Ordinance 2001 may be filed for failure to pass an order under Section 170 (4) of the Commissioner's Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 on this matter, the department was sleeping, and the application and two reminders associated with the return Was ignored. At the time when the Federal Tax Ombudsman Department had received comments through communication on the complaint received, it seemed that the reality of the situation had been made known and they soon issued letters to the DPC and the Income Tax. The issuance of a show cause notice under section 161/205 of the Ordinance 2001 may be made clear even to the complainant on the same date as the disclosure of corruption, as there are no steps to fulfill the legal obligation imposed by section 120 (4). top advocates from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer