Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MST. ALLAH WASAI

A. XVII R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 is a punishment for the nature of the provisions of Prohibition XVII, Rule 3, CPC, and must be exercised with care and caution. Had to go along with any litigator. Like the penalty for the closure of his evidence, he was entitled to give notice to the plaintiff not to notice that if at the next hearing, he failed to produce evidence, his right to present evidence was terminated. Because it applies to provide concessions. The three-year-old case was not allowed an appropriate opportunity to present evidence. The decision of both the courts and the order and the closure of the evidence was set aside and the trial court was remanded to the trial court for recording of the evidence. This can be decided later. advocates from Doaaba lawyer