Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Disposing of Evidence The sole witness's statement of the eye witness was the father of the deceased woman and lived in a separate house at some distance from the scene: According to the FIR, the witness was present on the spot. At the time of the incident, the complainant, who was the real brother of the accused at the trial, declined to give his statement, but on the testimony of the witness alone, the accused was sentenced by the trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment, which the High Court ordered. Submitted that the witness was not present at the scene of the incident and that he was an interested witness who was charged with accuracy. And I had a real brother who lived in separate rooms of the house with a yard complainant acknowledged his signature on his statement to the investigating officer. , Which was converted into an FIR Investigation Officer, stated that it filed the complainant's statement shortly after in the case in which the deceased's father's name was mentioned as an eyewitness. On the occasion, the victim's father's presence was established on the spot and only the fact that he was the father of the deceased or he was also a witness to the recovery of the weapon was not enough. Give him the name of a party or an interesting witness to refute his argument. There was no reason to deny such a natural truth witness, in light of the unrecognizable role of the late father's testimony, medical evidence and the recovery of the crime weapon are adequately assisted. Overall, the evidence lost by the trial court and the High Court was inconclusive. The accused, in relation to his crime, has two counts below advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer