Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (v), 337 L (ii) and 34 Guarantees, all injuries attributable to the accused were two-pronged weapons and none of the injured complainants were delayed. Was not in the important part. Five days into the filing of the FIR, the prosecution did not specify and allegedly recovered the accused's blood from the Investigation Officer's blood, although he was not bound by the courts. However, the investigation was of critical importance at the bail stage. The case was further investigated, the co-accused had already been released on bail by the trial magistrate and the accused played the role. Likewise, the principle of the seat / nature of the injury and its consistency was fully attracted as the accused had a controversial version of the incident in which he, along with two others, were injured. Those who were pressed into the FIR had not yet been determined who was the aggressor against the accused for a maximum sentence of five years, a prohibited clause of RPC Section 497. I did not come. Since the invoice was submitted, the trial had not begun and there was no possibility of an end in the near future, the accused no longer needed for investigative purposes and his further detention did not advance the prosecution's case. There was no more guarantees to be withheld. The conviction, especially when there was no allegation of tampering with the prosecution's evidence by the fugitives and the accused, is the case against the accused famous high court advocate from Nowshera lawyer