ZULFIQAR versus STATE
The testimony of Articles 307 and 308 was the father of the partially compromised complainant, and the two witnesses fully supported the prosecution's case. Was saved by the person who filed a review. In order to increase the conviction of the partial settlement accused, maximum punishment and conviction could not be accepted under Section 8308, PPC, the accused present at the trial were punished, even though the accused was convicted. Was proven on the ground and should have been. Section 2302 (b), sentenced under PPC, but neither the state nor the complainant has filed an appeal against the prosecution of the accused under section 2302 (b), PPC court. Through the trial, there was no alternative left to convict and convict the accused. Court of Appeal and adjunct plea filed to increase conviction, dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Dargai lawyer