DAWOOD COTTON MILLS LTD. versus K. F. DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Articles 14, 29, 30 and 33 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Referring to the dispute for arbitration, markup permission for the period before the date of the objection, decision and decree to award the award to the court , The High Court objected to the award where the award was filed to form the same principle of the court, the same amendment and the markup granted by the arbitrator before the judgment and decree, which was granted by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Section 29 was a clear violation of the provisions. The Arbitration Act, the court awarding the award as a rule of court, was only allowed to make the award roll related to the judgment / decree until the High Court had refused to allow interest until the payment of the surplus amount was serious. There was legal action. Prior to the order that the court did not have the power and authority to allow such interest in view of the provisions of section 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the Supreme Court allows the appeal, the theoretical decision of the High Court respondents. And the order will be exempt from the date order, until the payment of non-figures.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer