Find a Lawyer

SANA-UR-REHMAN AND OTHERS versus NAYYAR AHMED

Appeals against the jurisdiction of the section 185 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the appeal of a criminal trial of the Section 417 Supreme Court, and the courts below generally should not interfere with their finding where it is satisfied that They are reasonable and have not reached them by disregarding any accepted principles in the definition of evidence. It is a fact that the Supreme Court should adopt a different view of the evidence. The findings of the court below may be sufficient to revoke if the grounds on which the High Court has acted are not recordable, or the decision on the question of fact depends on misreading unacceptable evidence or evidence, or Where there has been a separation of procedures from the reception of the evidence or otherwise, the intervention of the Supreme Court shall be justified and the required Supreme Court is reluctant to make such orders unless it is certainly possible to prove it. That none of the grounds on which the accused has been acquitted is admissible, even though the evidence on record records a different conclusion. Can be done where the accused has been acquitted. Cannot be retained because the information recorded by the High Court is not clearly supported on the record; the intervention of the Supreme Court is not only justified but also in the interest of justice. immigration advocates phone number from Khushal Kot lawyer