Find a Lawyer

CITIBANK N.A. THROUGH MANAGER AND DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY OF THE BANK versus JUDGE BANKING COURT-III, LAHORE

Section 5 Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Affairs) Act (XV of 1997), Section 7 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), I IX, R 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Non-profit eligibility Alternatively dismissal of a case for illegal prosecution The date of the lawsuit filed by the bank was dismissed by the banking court for illegal proceedings and the application for reinstatement of the case was also dismissed. The bank held that the date on which the case was dropped was not a fixed date for hearing for any particular purpose. The court was not prepared to hear the proceedings before the Knocking Court because the borrower was demanding the adjournment on which the date on which the case was dismissed was not the date of the trial within the consideration of law. The hearing could not be against the bankruptcy court-approved plaintiff's order to formally exclude the case because it failed to apply. Proceeded to the relevant law and to the point that there was an exception to the question set by it that exercise of fair and equitable justice that violated judicial duty was violated by prima facie, illegal The appeal against the dismissal order for the prosecution's dismissal was not authorized. After the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984 and the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Finance Recovery) Act, 1997, no other remedy was available, therefore, delayed in maintaining the constitutional application filed by the bank and avoiding lenders. H immigration advocates contact from Digri lawyer