Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHEIKH CARPETS versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN

Sections 12 (1) and 23B (4) (5) (6) of the Adjustment Procedure and Appeal Rules, 1988, R4 (10) (4) (1) (5), (6), (7) and (8) Non-payment of the balanced export process was charged with non-payment of the provisions of the judicial proceedings illegal proceedings and the Appeal Rules 1988 by powers related to the showcase notice / Section 12 (1) of the Illegal Exchange Regulation Act ) Is in violation of the provisions of In 1947, it failed to return home the balance proceeds from the fixed period, the accused, in response to the notice of notice, appeared before the Adjudication Officer, stating that the balance of the export earnings was not authorized by the authorized dealer. Due to the behavior of the accused, the defendant realized the balance sale income provided several opportunities but the accused failed to do so because the authorized officer of the trial proceeded under judicial proceedings (10) and proceedings under the Appeal Rules 1988. And after recording the complainant and authorized statements, after checking the ad dealer and related records, By Validatei, the authorized officer imposed a fine, while during the approval of the Mutual Impressive Order, the competent officer did not meet the requirement of sub rule (4) to sub rule (4) of rule 4 of the Appeal Rules 1988. The accused was not asked to enter a written explanation, nor was it determined whether the accused had proved guilty or not. The authorized officer also did not make the allegation without fulfilling the required conditions of law, the complainant and The statement of the authorized dealer was recorded, the accused was not given the opportunity to defend it. If a judicial or quasi-judicial authority has a legal obligation to meet the law requirement solicitors from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer