FAROOQ HAMID versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL
A. XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), sections 53 and 55 of the defendants have sought injunction against the excavation and construction by the defendants that it is alleged to have been approved by the Development Authority. Approval of a demolished building project is collective, illegal and violates the standards. , Rules and other rules on the construction of the multi-storeyed plaza were denied because the Development Authority's regulatory authority was satisfied that the construction on the site was in accordance with building regulations or approved plans, so the defendants could not be called. That is the first case going on. Due to the issuance of a restraining order to prevent construction on the premises since the multi-storeyed building has already spread above the surface level, the loss of property to the defendants due to the digging of the ground to construct the basement The fear was no longer. The balance of the facility was therefore not in favor of the plaintiffs. I have no case for interference. M Pagandh was ordered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
