Find a Lawyer

FLEX-O-SIGN THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus LIAQAT ALI CHAUDHRY

Section 42 and 55 abolish the site allotment and sign board to the plaintiff for the installation of neon sign by the Punjab Development of States Act (XIX of 1976), section 44 easement act (v. 1879), section 4 suit for Partners and Horticulture Authority. ? Disclosure of Plaintiff for Road Width on Authority's Oral Promise Upon Completion of Work Due to the Authority's ban on the installation of signboards in the Green Belt, the refusal of the plaintiff to allot the controversial site to the plaintiff's currency And the authority violates this policy after the leave of the order. The Chief Minister was authorized by the court to be allocated a place in spite of the ban, while the Chief Minister had approved the plaintiff for re-allotment of the site by the promise authority while allotting the controversial site to another person. Prior rights and the plaintiffs were denied the right to sue. The authority was serious and illegal; thus, the suit was retained. The suit was ordered under the circumstances. best law firms from Narowal lawyer