LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus ARIF MANZOOR QURESHI
Article 12 (2) The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), without recording the evidence of the parties, passed the order that the petitioner rejected the decree on the basis of fraud, collusion and misrepresentation. The request was that the orders for the waiver of the disputed plots were invalid; the fake, fake, thus, the defendant / plaintiff was not a lawful transferee. It was summarily reviewed by the trial court to review the dismissal and In the constitutional petition, the dismissal of such application by the High Court was not justified in view of any serious allegations. The need to record the evidence of the parties and the parties, especially when the order was passed without recording the evidence of the parties, has been finalized by the Development Authority in connection with the controversial plots directed by the Supreme Court. , The Supreme Court accepted the appeal, setting aside its controversial decisions. The High Court and the courts below dictate that such a request be enforced and, after recording the evidence of the parties, want to be adjourned to the trial court within a stipulated time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer