Find a Lawyer

SHAKEEL AHMAD MALIK versus STATE

Sections 498 and 497 (2) of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17, 18 and 22 pre-arrest bail, the approval of the prosecution's further investigation was stopped on the statements of the three deported persons, but all of them as accused. Were involved in this case. Because they were absconding with the law. And their whereabouts could not be ascertained; during the trial, deported persons never appeared before the trial court and although the trial court had tried and sentenced the accused, their sentences were dismissed by the High Court. The adjournment was suspended in view and the Supreme Court upheld the order. After more than a year, who had left Pakistan, the High Court accused had entered the country, the agency had failed to collect any evidence, to prove that the accused was present in Pakistan that day. , The investigation was complete and the suspect no longer needed to be investigated. Sending the suspects behind bars will do no good. In the case of the accused under further scrutiny, the interim pre-arrest bail has already been granted. The same is confirmed in the circumstances against the same surety bond. advocate from Hariwala lawyer