Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 506/LB AND 1233/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2005. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 506/LB AND 1233/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 7TH SEPTEMBER, 2005.

Appealing to Section 129 Additional Commissioner Instead of Canceling Appeal, the assessee states that it was not permissible for the first appellate authority to remand the matter for de novo assessment but it was known After assuming that Assisi has some power over his arguments and the diagnosis should be canceled instead. Before giving the department another chance to fill in liquidity, the appellate authority decided a ground in favor of revenue, under which it reopened the case through the issuing authority, however, all other grounds for it. The decision was made in favor of the SC but still the case was set aside to consider de novo while the first appellate authority did not elaborate on the issue and decided with the observation that the purchases were made. Based on information received from the Sales Tax Department regarding purchases of overdose. Discussion on other grounds, along with the observation that the proceedings were justified by the SC, also stated that there was some force on the grounds that contradicted the results given at the time of its disposal. Travels beyond boundaries and therefore keeps the matter separate. Other grounds in favor of the SCASI's first appellate authority, on the whole, accepted the assurances submitted by the SCI that it was almost accepted and there was no justification for the remand of the case. patent advocate from Khanqah Dogran lawyer