Find a Lawyer

AAMIR HASSAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Section 236 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Telephone users purchase tolerance connection activation `chip off 'for Rs 2,999, which is printed in its folder, e.g. Tax company issues only tax deduction / collection respect certificate on the sale of calling cards of \ but not to enable connection \ Central Board of Revenue deducts on activating cellular phones despite mention of Finance Minister There was no method for calculation. In his Budget Speech of 2004, about Rs 1,000 to reduce the tax for this service and up to Rs one thousand and the complainant claims adjustment / refund in prepaid tax complaint against the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax Accuracy. As well as the Central Board of Revenue had to be understood to explain the procedure, if any, by whom the recovery was being made and by which the claim for credit / refund / adjustment could be made. This was a matter of public perception, in which case the government is likely to be lost when the holding agent Federal Tax Ombudsman filed a petition with Central B The Word of Revenue recommended a necessary amendment to the United Nations Section 236. The Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 increased its scope, which is currently limited to only `prepaid card to ', so the tax amount (activation charges) accumulated on the sale of chips is also credited to the public account and the instruction. To make the appropriate announcement. Also a deterrent agent for the public at large. n advocates from Fateh Pur lawyer