MST. MUNAWAR KHANUM versus MESSRS HABIB BANK LIMITED
Sections 17 and 19 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) AXXI R 66 were enforced in the trial of the appellant's discretion in the sale of mortgaged property or forfeiture of goods, and the order against his complaint The letter was also approved. The appellant was that for the first time a valid contract should be sold for the execution of the decree, it was left at the discretion of the trial court, in any way or mode, under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Execute a decree, or under a law. Or that the decision was not in any way considered appropriate, was not in a position to propose a decree to execute the decree in any particular way and at his will, but rather this order It was at the discretion of the receiving bank. The appellant who was executed by any of the execution methods provided for under the law, cannot be allowed to plead that he sold the first counterfeit goods instead of M. Apart from the immovable property, when the bank was of the view that no list of hypothecated goods was provided to the executors, the order passed by the execution court was not subject to illegal work and the High Court also intervened. Was denied, under which this appeal was dismissed. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
